Tu-154M Krasair 85759 - Misc Video

Tu-154M Krasair 85759 | Rating: 4.4!

Misc Video

Very sad to look at it, but it is waiting for almost all aircraft of the company. This board was still with the resource and a good account of flying he was 10 years, no less.

→ Size: 53 MB

→ Date: 16 years ago (11.07.2010 23:25)

→ Author: Jakut

→ Uploaded by: Jakut (uploaded 3 files )

→ Approved by moderator: NetHunter

→ License: Freeware - Free version, Do Not Redistribute

→ Downloaded: 3111 time(s)

Watch Online Comments 367 View ZIP-Content Download

not one hour forth to this aircraft, I remember him even in the colors of Murmansk Airlines in the Russian flag at the top of the tail, and the inscription Norilsk Nickel in the nose, this board when it was even considered the most emergency carcass Kras Air, and this sad in twins ... − Eyakuba, 16 years ago, #

And his and forth to my work, it is not needed now, nobody nobody copy Zakharov − becass, 16 years ago, #

Damn, if only as something alive and killed gutted ... Horror. − Ivan_SS, 16 years ago, #

"Agslshtp fyy" − Tony Longy, 16 years ago, #

what ?????????????? − Sasha-ac, 16 years ago, #

Foreign phrase our letters ... − Tony Longy, 16 years ago, #

Other words, unfortunately no ... − Tony Longy, 16 years ago, #

It is not possible at this smotret.Serdtse blood oblivaetsya.Do sdez hurt. − Acman, 16 years ago, #

agree on 100% only aiRoNe Do not spray − Sasha-ac, 16 years ago, #

Because aiRoNe - a realist, as, indeed, and myself. There is only dispose of old aircraft, but you made a hysterical as the funeral of a loved one (God forbid). It's only a set of units. And do not grow on this occasion nurse. − Georgian_Airways, 16 years ago, #

Got something to mourn, to cut Airbus did not thoughtful, instead of the same will be brand new, but the plane did not replace the brand-new Tupolev Tu-154, which is why have to mourn if the Soviet Union was, I am sure that the carcasses would be flying right now with the new engine and avionics and build new IL-86 and IL-96, but it will not happen, that's the trouble, will not be new aircraft ... − DownSet, 16 years ago, #

Airbus will cut only about 10 years at least)) Yes, and cut in the literal sense is unlikely to be - he's half plastic − Georgian_Airways, 16 years ago, #

Jakut, nothing you have posted this video, by God! One more reason for conflict among small and large Simmer disorders among aviators. − Fulcrum83, 16 years ago, #

agree on 100%. Once again surfaced negative memories of shredding over 85,005. − Sasha-ac, 16 years ago, #

In DMD is Krasovskii 767 th polurazobranniy with him that will do? The same way, so that's hack? − Georgian_Airways, 16 years ago, #

That equipment would have to take them on CBS, or the cockpit. − Владимир Пахомов, 16 years ago, #

I only do not understand - why they started to dismantle its Report your quite flyable was aboard, could sell the same TCO, or C7 − Georgian_Airways, 16 years ago, #

Thus, in DMD, too, was two trupovyh 747 TCO their pochikali already or not? − Mihail Stepanov, 16 years ago, #

They stood still on the distant parking lot, one just stands there, he had recently seen − ILAS, 16 years ago, #

Well at least they dragged on long stay, and that scared people :-)) − Mihail Stepanov, 16 years ago, #

Parking on the far AVC, and they are 747 th in front of faboriki catering for building S7 and near the car park. Well, this is so, tentatively ... So motorists, parks there, all is well in sight. =)) − ILAS, 16 years ago, #

Yeah too ...!!! In our country, almost-almost all through the f ... ny! Apparently, it is easier ... − wegass, 16 years ago, #

I repeat again, but children are not over .. Well, although the course, and this problem will soon decide if there will come .. Well, of course, what .. − Vladimir_76, 16 years ago, #

Horror! − spectr, 16 years ago, #

Well, why spread it? Soul pat? Well, thank you − Vladimir_76, 16 years ago, #

This Tu-154M? And not IL? − Vladimir_76, 16 years ago, #

Look at telezhechku ... Yes, and the nose of the Ilyushin, certainly not. − Ravnmm, 16 years ago, #

Well dolly, yes, of course .. still does not look like a nose − Vladimir_76, 16 years ago, #

As if part of you have taken and torn, sad to look at it. He was like a living, but now the feeling as if he devoured and nothing unfortunate could not do tupolenok ... uhuh ((((((((((((( − Ravnmm, 16 years ago, #

Raschka pancake ... − Anthony, 16 years ago, #

-1

A feast for the eyes) would have put 10, if it were possible) − Ilimsky, 15 years ago, #

sadist fucking =))) − Roma1364, 15 years ago, #

-1

operator goner − thespaceweare, 15 years ago, #

Even before I dig what I estimate is true for putting a video of the discharge fifth tchka luxury! − Roma1364, 15 years ago, #

Justify your koment thespaceweare. − Jakut, 15 years ago, #

-1

Potsrioty, you are so stupid ... Let's start with that: Airbus, Boeing - the most pleasing to the consumer's perspective - namely, the passenger, they have such convenience - that missing from a Tupolev. Secondly, the aircraft Airbus / Boeing - most advantageous to Fight itself ak mk Treyew less fuel, as well as the crew of 2 people, it turns out they are paying wages for 2 people - one of the crew (not counting bp), and not as a Tupolev - 3. Third, what difference does a beautiful or No? You buy a pink or black VAZ 2109 Lancer X? Pink is beautiful and glamor! Next potsrioty! It is time to measure the plane - OBSOLETE! You buy a camera, for example, CANON? Y xy **? Potsrioty, buy Zenith, what are you? You just bear such nonsense that read prativno, you really create your ac avsime airlines and see what profitable contain the TU-154 or the Airbus / Boeing? That's right, and yet, the feeling that everyone who writes nonsense, such as DownSet, own their AK? − TaPo4eG, 16 years ago, #

Moreover, for example, our Russian Ac want to take a big downward and receive a greater benefit, thus to be worthy competitor to other ac and how they come out of your forward buying Tupolev aircraft, which require only several times more? Fuel, maintenance and so on? You think only of yourself, you can put that way ... You do pofigu on the economy o, competition, you would lizh: Aeroflot, with ***, pakupayte Tu154, and we do not like avsimovtsam sho you fly inastranyh samaletah? ... − TaPo4eG, 16 years ago, #

Well finally! tapo4eg I completely at all "stopitstsot" percent agree with you! your post is one of the few appropriate comments on this video! − pro100gamer, 16 years ago, #

+20

Young enough porob nonsense already. That any such facilities at no carcass, that is the Boeing Company? You own it at least once in the carcass to fly? On our Boeing (classic) is awful seat pitch. In my not very high growth rests on the back of vperedisidyaschego passenger. Dinner in the plane just did not really-it's just struggle elbows which it turns! Or just take turns! ARD works only in the machine and being terribly goes over the ears to reduce! There is no buffet, no vestibule, which is a bus! Nutrition badyazhat for tensioning shutter in front of the entrance door! It is almost in front of the so-called "business class" (by the way the governor flew in this business) so he released the entire series, and his face packing up the food! Passage terribly narrow (standard bobikovskaya truck barely passes) and miss with the oncoming passenger is not really! Besides, Bobby breaks easily! And there is no spare on 2nedeli and he is stupid! And at this time the plant a good old proven poltnik and fly! Range from classics little! Something to any charter does not hold! A poltinik easily. And you all cling to the fuel consumption? In the end, for the kerosene paying passenger. I overpaid for the kerosene to securely and comfortably and not as a herd of cows fly! Our company has purchased two (2!) Poltinika have aerofloat from under the knife! For that BIG BIG RESPECT leadership of the company! And you, stupid young people so stupid and will die, pre-sales in a couple of dollars. Generally shkolota already got on this site, 80% of young morons with twisted psyche! Neither any of these 80% no stage did any aircraft, the ambition had a Minister! In times of Stepan Gritsevskogo entirely different audience was! It was a golden time, when everyone was doing something for each other and no Ponty pounded in kamentah a pity that it is not returned, TUPEYTE MORE! − Mihail Stepanov, 16 years ago, #

Mihail Stepanov, in solidarity with you, all right saying. Only here the system pressure to decrease as it did not notice, maybe hollow, but overall not so important) − Ravnmm, 16 years ago, #

Michael, in which company do you work? More .. "Seasons of Stepan Gritsevskogo .. And what is the time, could be clarified? − Jenya77, 16 years ago, #

Eugene, it was a time when instead golimogo and monotonous video, the repository AVSIMA were laid, made his hands to improve the sim. And this despite the fact that while the information was much less. Now complete disk imaging, are just making virtually no. It is fashionable to criticize. For this rating is growing faster. Michael, do not have BAKSOSCHETCHIKOV asking about the history of our aircraft, it is not interesting to them, they are interested in the history of bucks. :) − SheV, 16 years ago, #

Infrequent case when fully agree with Michael Stepanov. Sneakers, you Aeroflot especially not remember, instead of the old AFL Tupolev buying new equipment. Better to remember the other a / c instead of the old Tupolev purchase old Bobby. If you say, there was no such? It was, and still is, although it was not on such a scale as it was in the 90's and early 2000's. As it was before - there is someone to tell you another question - will want to know. Let them, 747 have TCO new or something? CWR drove and flew to health. And junk in Arizona is a lot, and fly around the world a lot, all over Russia will be enough since you with prostogeymerom "do not worry. Customer benefits A and B occurs only in the case of their novelty - it is an axiom for any technology. The crew of 2 people - many, let's leave one? And s / n 2 times less need to pay. − Ру19300, 16 years ago, #

Mihail Stepanov, and now so let's put the question: what camera you have? Or a mobile phone? − TaPo4eG, 16 years ago, #

TapoCheG - in this country there were three most powerful things in the Soviet Union - the defense industry, aviation and nuclear umbrella. "All of your tricks to hint at the modern use of imported accessories of modern life - the result of market economy, Gorbachev and Yeltsin. A young man - calm down and keep quiet, you have nothing to teach us yet;) − RAID74, 16 years ago, #

MDA has long pointed out that 90% of users Avsima hreneyut on the type of Tu-154, listen to sound only D-30KU-154, is the most beautiful airplane only Tu-154 and niipet, and abbreviations as "Tu-154", sorry, ends. Calm down, era Tupolev has already passed, yes, was a legendary, yes, the government receives is not good, even destroying the monuments, but aviation is not finished on the Tu-154. I do not argue, do not want now to put our aircraft in the stream, fly with us, basically, Bombardier, Embraer, Boeing, Airbus, but it's aircraft, which later Tu-154. Progress is moving and in 30-40 years no one will look at the A-320 and will also be debates about him. Michael, honestly, nothing against you, and Tu-154 did not have himself to fly it, but his posts you remind me of the so-called "potsreota" which cries out that Tupolev better and did not hear. A similar gavkalki for which Tupolev - God, bread, meaning of life (and this life is lived only 13-15 years old) desperately pros and yelling that everyone except them shkolota, stupid people, and so forth. I understand that after my post will srach and would not be surprised if I stuck a lot of cons, but let's be adults and realize that there is no AC, which takes care of the consumer market will not buy a Tupolev NOR-COH-YES! − Stakan, 16 years ago, #

And even if they buy a Boeing, which is 15-20 years of work, but it will conform to the standards on noise, ecology, comfort, safety − Stakan, 16 years ago, #

I would say that it's not about how much concrete used or in operation, and how many hours he has flown. It is likely that some 320 were released in 1991, flew in a total of 100 hours of AK, then he bought another AK as a 19-year-old Airbus. But the old junk he does not call ... − Georgian_Airways, 16 years ago, #

West and 320 perform a minimum of 4 flights a day. Let's say from 6 am until after midnight. Approximately 19 hours a day. A resource of such aircraft approximately 50000 Ground-Air-Ground-tsiklov.teper can calculate how much they already flew before, so how did they get to Russia. But in Russia, 320 and 737 already flew his life I think so. − Sasha-ac, 16 years ago, #

The Soviet machine resources just to be more than the Western, because the Soviet hardier machines than Boeing and ayrbusy. − Sasha-ac, 16 years ago, #

Georgian_Airways, unfortunately, his commentary, you have shown utter ignorance of the topic. AK, which for 19 years, flew to the multimillion-dollar (price) plane only 100 (well, even 1000) hours - has long ceased to exist. I recommend you read books on basic economics, while commonplace mathematics come here. Sasha-ac rights is overbought raid in Russia Bobik and watermelons, and stories about 747e AK Trans, for example, simply plunged into shock and the question: why are they as yet have not fallen all? However, it is a matter of time ... Stakan, you're partly right, of course, such a reaction - this is a clever "promotion" I would say PT - not whether this team and their excellent aircraft, it would not be so euphoric about the TU154. This psychology:) I would be a day IL-96 and just be admired:) BUT! There is such a word - Romance! Romance of the sky, aircraft, aviation in general. And if a person does not understand that romance does not feel it and can not remain silent when another of its enduring and nostalgic - this is very sad - because these people I see 90's generation - a generation reared on films about murders, cynicism, money and greed. And - no romance. I hope my idea with a hint of transparent enough? :) A wise man said: the ability to remain silent in time - a very important and useful skill:) − RAID74, 16 years ago, #

Comfort of passengers in the first place for our AK - advertising. For normal AC (and not just ours) in the first place SAVINGS. At all. Since acquiring the aircraft. Otherwise, how to live? But what's there - how to steal? The old carcasses that Elah that used foreign cars ... The main income. And we deeply do not care how you personally sit in the chair. Few of us all, as the president of the AC and put out, the priorities for the next. Probably .... If, to these very old carcasses were poekonomichney cars, they are dismantled, would be a great success. And the fly-you would not look at them on their ....- years of age. No one except you can not thrill from the fact that you are flying on brand-new from the factory, airplane. And the view of pilots Shipka any who did not care. Only, the crew would be smaller and s / n smaller. That's all NEOPATRIOTIZM. Let us take the brand-new water-melons, fly 5 years and sell them in Germany. Then we'll talk. − Gennn, 16 years ago, #

"Let's take the brand-new water-melons, fly 5 years and sell them in Germany. Then we'll talk" - golden words:) − RAID74, 16 years ago, #

You want simple arithmetic. I'm alone in Germany in the aviation department at the engineer on the aircraft. And I went through practice Lufthansa techniques. I unfortunately do not have the right to disclose figures. But I know that spare parts for Boeing and airbusy very expensive. Because it is processed to the last details of a micron. In the west, such tollerantsi.Na Russian planes have parts Tolerance relations will be a little more on what makes them hardier. One working hour turner or milling costs in Germany, about 60 euros per hour chas.Odin working machine, computer controlled, it is worth of 100 euros and above. The materials, ie, metal alloys and composite materials that are in the plane, you know, too, are very expensive. And now all this accounting we will move to Russia. And you will see that Russia will be on the details of preparation is a lot cheaper, at least 60 or 70%. I know that Europe is reluctant to give Russia a license to manufacture all spare parts to the western car, because the know that they are competitors. And I'm in it, and said that the Russian AK repair is very costly, than a carcass or silt. And the reason why the Russian AK buying these otbroski west, because the west does not want to see in their airports Russian samolety.Oni believe that if the Russian plane, be sure to break. When Lech Kotchinsky died on his 154, the Germans immediately the same was told that 154 is a coffin on the wings, though they were our craft. so that the guys have come to the West Russia dictates its terms. One thing I can say. are 737-300 and 737-500, which still fly the Germans will soon be written off. Lufthansa made a big order for 320 from Airbusa. And Lufthansa is how I understand it is not going to dispose of its 737. They will probably go to Russia or where ever in Africa. And then the AK save money on training pilots on the Western type of aerial chariots. And the result is such a sad story as the Aeroflot-Nord 737-500 in the Permian. − Sasha-ac, 16 years ago, #

Guys, there is much talk about fuel economy. And you can ask a question: The price of a ticket is any different to the Tupolev and Boeing with airbusom ?????? Mihail Stepanov srl rights with regard to comfort. Comfort is not any. Range is not that big. And 737 and 320 are not so-so and fast as the Tu-154. − Sasha-ac, 16 years ago, #

And, incidentally, are not so tall − Vladimir_76, 16 years ago, #

Tapo4eG. Armor take off and climbed out of the tank, we are talking about different things and quote where I am writing nonsense ... − DownSet, 16 years ago, #

about the price - just for the bean / watermelon AK more money in your pocket put yourself − Georgian_Airways, 16 years ago, #

-2

"Hnyyy, hnyyyy bl .. Th carcase break" dissolved nyuni.Tushkofily pancake pancake. So what, that break. Privratili avsim in the bazaar, as much disgusted to read your entire "Tushkosyachinu." And all because western countries are much faster already ahead of us in razvitii.Vse sooner or later will go to scrap. Vaughn Zhiguli fuckin excavator pressured ER200 finally can cut the metal, instead of it now before Peter German Sapsan goes, so you did not boot odd about this. And because of some samoletishka lit pancake panic. What you the same A320 or B737 are not satisfied? No, well, I'm aware there sorry, the plane nice and all, but not to bring it all to the insanity? Certainly there is if the same D30KU-154 replaced by a bourgeois Pratt & Witney, or General Electric - all of you chorus start yelling "It's not the Tu-154, is not the Tu-154. We want a normal TU-154. Normal Tu-154 is already obsolete. Schas stepped century Airbus `s and Boeing` s. In general, my opinion is that the Soviet aviation industry, or to upgrade, or under the press. PS Can minusovat long as you personally it is my opinion> ( − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

We do that normally turns out - this is military technology and military aviation. Wow, have something to boast about, but the rest is all garbage ... − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

It is interesting to look more MS-21 and Superjet-100 − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

Peregrine falcon is like Russian?? − let1997, 15 years ago, #

Yeah, like hell he was Russian. German ICE-4 repainted under the Railways, RZD is now incidentally not Railways and pid. − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

Schas won Boeing 767 will also hack and 2013. completely replaced by A330. − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

Accept my work machine, and then going straight through all eternity to fly. Now a new time. I really like the Be-200. And why not upgrade a passenger transport? It would be very appropriate, and economically. − Leonidos, 15 years ago, #

-2

UHWW you complete freak time this email! − Eyakuba, 15 years ago, #

UHWW - how would you answer, so not much to offend ..... No, I can probably ... − victr3756, 15 years ago, #

PS Can minusovat long as you personally this is my opinion> (Sorry buddy, but it's not an opinion, and thoughts uebana. − Anderson66, 15 years ago, #

Tu-154 airplane beautiful ... Yes it is a legendary aircraft, which is plowed in Russia for several decades and no one thousand pilots missed by myself, not one thousand cadets opened the way to heaven! This - the plane is a legend demands and deserves to him worthy of respect! Including All what you said - it's diarrhea moral monster! − ARTMOTO63, 15 years ago, #

Anderson66, zhzhesh! =) − serg09, 15 years ago, #

"In general my opinion is that the Soviet aircraft industry, or to upgrade, or the press." Yes, I have something here got excited. Sorry. − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

-3

Che for delirium, UHWW what on ** th century Airbus and Boeing, since when has come just after the collapse of the Soviet Union vultures will feel cheated and to market their Boeings and other debris, and you live in a country that once did the best we can say planes are carrying such nonsense simply pipets, I emphasize - "The Age of Airbus and Boeing" Nonsense, the Age of Fools in one word! − DownSet, 15 years ago, #

Listen, and you would not vulture would throw garbage chtoli?? You are not traders. That will - fell swoop would be different! − Эрник, 15 years ago, #

That's exactly what I particularly do not the businessman and the glory of God and love aviation just like that, but love is center began with a Soviet aircraft and is deeply ieper in the heart, and many simply because of the love of money ruined the domestic aviation industry, all of us today * at. .. however as you, but I do not have * at, I childhood forth to this aircraft and now I live like on another planet and it hurts me to watch as the remnants of the motherland just break down, and it is already deeply in my heart, you do not understand. − DownSet, 15 years ago, #

In short enough, enough. Then lay out a normal roller with the aircraft, and not about how they cut and break down, because it's just disgusting to watch, and even disgusting to read comments. Against Tu-154 I have nothing and I like it even really like it. But I just got tired of sitting and listening to whining from other users. Count me whoever you want, but if something like that appears on this site (where "Utilization of the Tu-154 Aeroflot" and "Utilization of Tu-154 at ENEA), I just put the stake and will not even look at it. I think I put it clearly ... − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

ARTMOTO63 same can be said for Boeing and Airbus about. And he and another beautiful, who plowed more than a dozen years (including in Russia) have missed more than a thousand pilots through themselves, students, passengers, etc. − Jeno, 15 years ago, #

C great pleasure to be watched as Airbus here so torn to pieces or Boeing! − Alexander318i, 15 years ago, #

Alexander318i, nice view ... http://www.avsim.su/f/dokumentalnie-filmi-i-syuzheti-96/krilatiy-metallolom-35316.html − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

-3

Glory USA! − Paulsoft, 16 years ago, #

The glory of my balls, buddy. − serg09, 15 years ago, #

ahahahahahahahaah − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

Some wisdom of you * k. A Mood * Cove in the bank! − Эрник, 15 years ago, #

-4

Idiots, one word ... All managers who decommissioning Tu-shki, and put in replacements shit-737 and freaks-AN-148 - that they should so break to pieces !!!!! − Duke3D1981, 15 years ago, #

Certainly cool. But I fully endorse. − elektron66, 15 years ago, #

-1

Duke3D1981 please do not write anything. Sick of the progress of your thoughts. Freaks ... Look at yourself first of all, yes? − Jeno, 15 years ago, #

Jeno - let's you I will not specify what to do, but I would not say where you go, huh? − Duke3D1981, 15 years ago, #

-8

Raschka, Putin ... − Mihail Stepanov, 16 years ago, #

Yes, would not Putin, flew to a carcass more years poppet stopitstsot − pro100gamer, 16 years ago, #

yeah, and we flew at them ... and all the other newcomers on watermelon and Bobby .. Of course a pity that such krasavey no longer fly in the sky .. but all the same machine morally and physically obsolete ... And there's nothing to be done about it .. We can only sim .. there she seemed to be forever! ... − ryabov_912, 16 years ago, #

What do you all Putin, but Putin, whom we did not put - all horseradish budut.Uveren, would have been in power for someone else, I'd sit and just write ... Tu-154 with a t a r e l! And sitting here from a Patriots build, that's psevdoapakivanie already reeks! I am also sorry for this car well, not to the same stepeni.No have Jo to do something new! But this side is better would be given to the museum with a * ki − Avsimer_Denis, 16 years ago, #

-9

Mudlony, staged a dance on the bones ... Everyone who opened his mouth here on the subject of "junk" - so it's in your head trash and umishka and conscience with a sparrow's beak. Oaf offensive. I bet you its pathetic zhizneshki done even worse than this plane ... Back to you and the road! − Shatoux, 15 years ago, #

/ Emocry: D − Intel_Rus, 15 years ago, #

Shatoux - a typical representative of the family tushkodrocherov !=)))))))))))))))))))) − UHWW, 15 years ago, #

-11

Good riddance! − mosyou, 16 years ago, #

You do not accidentally while Putin? And you there too, imbitsil − Mihail Stepanov, 16 years ago, #

Schas PToydy zaminusyat:)) − KirillS, 16 years ago, #

Community begins to divide into Soviet aircraft enthusiasts and those who already love Bourgeois vacuum cleaners, but do not forget that for many of the Tu-154 is the first love in the air, his childhood, the best years, losing those planes like I'm losing my home bit by bit ... − DownSet, 16 years ago, #

-2

Bourgeois vacuum HDDD so much better than a vacuum svistoperdyshi TU-134 − pro100gamer, 16 years ago, #

pro100gamer sad to hear when so says the Russian people about the achievements of Soviet thought. − Ravnmm, 16 years ago, #

Soviet thought over 20 years ago. We must eventually turn a page and start another − Georgian_Airways, 16 years ago, #

134th from 60-70 years produced, I'm talking about them, you're just a bit off topic. It is in my case, those who designed, constructed this car in a distant Soviet times, this is the achievement of Soviet thought, but what she ended 20t years ago, it is clear to all. − Ravnmm, 16 years ago, #

New Youth - the new Russia, as a result - birthplace of ugly has nothing, nothing to be proud, to fly on a bourgeois shit, pro100gamer you're just unlucky chelovecheshko, you're not born in that great country where I was born, where was a great civil aviation, where there was great country where everyone was proud that he was a citizen of the USSR, and you're just a Russian, just a citizen bespontovoy country that ruined their history and if you do not vkurivaesh of Soviet patriotism, do not bother here at all, the Tu-154 is a Soviet plane for the Soviet people, not for the Russians , fly on its Boeing and do not touch the memory soveskih people ... − DownSet, 16 years ago, #

Sorry, but write with great motherland bukvy.Ya, I believe that my country and my motherland deserved this. − Acman, 16 years ago, #

Absolutely agree with DownSet − gloryan, 16 years ago, #

Stepanov meme: We've been on the "you"? And learn to write in Russian, and then read the funny! And what zaminusyat - so I do not give a hoot. I wrote as "it" really is. If someone took to heart - it is your problem related to this aircraft. − mosyou, 16 years ago, #

-13

I fully agree with tranzit_il.Hlam-in the trash and how can skoree.Vedro, not samolet.Seychas came another era.Boing and Airbus-are much more economical, and most importantly bezopasnee.Nikogda no respect for the Soviet aviation industry. − Voyageur, 16 years ago, #

Especially Boeing 707, the most "safe" machine in the world! :) − serg09, 16 years ago, #

Oooo now you threw outs and evaluation set can not. Too bad you both about the domestic aviation industry! For reference, the Tu-154 never fell because of failures. Only because of the mistakes pilots. So the bucket is you xD − serembon, 16 years ago, #

Neatly into the turns, what you call junk is one of the best aircraft in the world, all fucked * NIL a bourgeois beside him did not stand, it's our plane, killing the plane we kill domestic aviation, the damned country has killed all that remains of a great country. .. − DownSet, 16 years ago, #

Voyadeur I as a Soviet citizen is ready to send you to hell ... − DownSet, 16 years ago, #

serembon whose is it did not fall then? Falling more than once ... But after Boeing fell more but not because the plane bad but because they are flying for 40 years, all in patches .... And about the Tupolev is our media does not try energetically promoting it in the best light, even if the bulb burned out in the cabin all day occurred in the cabin katastrova TU154 burned out light bulb in flight ekipazhe performed an emergency descent and etc. .. but all swallowed oh what a terrible pancake samalet th oh oh .... − An_Shaitan_24, 16 years ago, #

Songs Zaharova

PT Tu-154B2 Gazpromavia RA-85751

Il-18 Edgar Guinart for FSX

МиГ Е-155 Р1

Аэропорт звартноц Ереван udyz

Mesh water Kapchagai

Tu-154B2

Tupolev ANT-6A-4M34FRNA v1.0