MI-8 helicopter flying under the Troitsky Bridge!
| Rating: 3.7!
+1
5
And I liked it:)
− iuuBB00iss,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Pay attention to the silver OLA 6 th second movie, and specifically - to sign-logotype (LESTA). Then poguglite. Questions no longer exist by themselves. :)
− sergg,
17 years ago,
#
+1
4
Not bad, made bad but the author knows the dynamics of the Mi-8 so you can already tell montage ..... Although if given a bigger distance to break up and made more realistic flight already on the bridge would go over real )))))) After Effects fully demonstrates its ability to ....
− bolt,
17 years ago,
#
Yes would not have passed for real. Antoine said, perfectly evident that the helicopter, 3d, immediately from the first frame, before he begins the passage. The mere appearance gives a helicopter-small nuances of lighting, materials, etc. Ok, can not all of these nuances are visible, but they are.
− Bravo,
17 years ago,
#
Yes and here Antoine. Kzhdy who sees this, sees the schedule. What argument do?
− susanin,
17 years ago,
#
+1
5
Comments "witnesses" very painful factitious. I think if this was in the Real, the recording was continuous MAT:) In principle, do not poorly implemented fufel.
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
5
Только с разделом ошиблись - Надо было в "Юмор".
− Kazachek,
14 years ago,
#
1
not be
− makhotaroman,
16 years ago,
#
Of course not - said the same: "amateur video":) Very high quality amateur installation. Well done guys:)
− RAID74,
15 years ago,
#
+1
and put the count - do not deserve!
− RAID74,
15 years ago,
#
1
kgam. editor apparently left heel lepil ... box shown.
− Ту154М 85123,
17 years ago,
#
Well, since you then, dear, SЃS‡R°SЃ kaaak show how to mount the video!
− КурсМП,
17 years ago,
#
but it was more human?
− ZA09,
17 years ago,
#
3
And, you can look here but mentally there vpihnut MI-8 ... A terrible sight to ... (on video, he "flies" is not in the central span) http://ershovmarine.com/maps-river/part-3-1/pic/p31-00-a3.htm (Kirov bridge)
− b00blik,
17 years ago,
#
Trinity Bridge is!
− mark979,
16 years ago,
#
Why are you writing to him - he was at first unable to read, and secondly, died long ago (9 months ago):)))
− RAID74,
16 years ago,
#
1
I think that it is Pi-C of a film. Type as the notorious "get into a wax ransacking the office manager" was just another advertisement bekmambetovskoy kinishki.
− slyalikov,
17 years ago,
#
A unit of what? Video is in the relevant section ....
− tserg,
17 years ago,
#
The unit for the fact that did not like.
− slyalikov,
17 years ago,
#
5
Well done!
− летун,
17 years ago,
#
5
installation, clearly! 10 tons of live lyuminiya flit like Robinson)))) ... who doubt look at the video with the refusal of MI 14 during takeoff from the water as the water in ryabit ometaemoy HB Square ...
− davidbrayn,
17 years ago,
#
5
An excellent movie, but not real ...
− Airis16,
17 years ago,
#
ahahahahaha * someone else is seriously perceive as reality?
− mozila,
17 years ago,
#
5
Will go for fun. In reality, the crew would have sentenced themselves, at best, to the exclusion of the airworthiness of work forever.
− Vikfis,
17 years ago,
#
Super is really all )))))
− AN72,
17 years ago,
#
Divorce
− ru_19_300,
17 years ago,
#
+2
and mother's maiden name ...:))
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
1
razvodnyak! Mi-8 smart car, but it is assembling 100%
− stas221,
17 years ago,
#
Yes you have that? From the mind jumping off, and I then took valenok ...:))
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
http://www.avsim.su/forum/razve-eto-vozmozhno-t78837.html http://www.avsim.su/forum/piter-gorod-kontrastov--t78707.html
− Bravo,
17 years ago,
#
5
cool))) when was that??? recently??
− TAG,
17 years ago,
#
This 3-D assembly. Already a hundred times in the forum discussed.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
I have not seen ..
− TAG,
17 years ago,
#
5
This may not be .... still can not believe ....
− starship,
17 years ago,
#
3D is very easy, a lot of factors.:)
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
then, I thought that once it is unrealistic from under his left ...
− starship,
17 years ago,
#
then, I thought that once it is unrealistic from under his left ...
− starship,
17 years ago,
#
Antoine! And would it not you so kind, especially for such primeval as I list the above factors you! Note to adopt to the next time lohonutsya not, and does not accept the falsification of the "face value". We are grateful. Is ready to record.
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
MaG®tre! Where are you? A u-u-u! I impatience! Maybe you are looking for the answer in Google or Yandex? You all know it. No?
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
Quiet! Do not stir. He thinks.
− susanin,
17 years ago,
#
faaktory in the studio!
− HaN,
17 years ago,
#
+1
1. water, 2. bystanders, 3.dinamika, 4. lack of coverage of this fact in the media ... you not? ;)
− fly-max,
17 years ago,
#
+1
KirillS why are you so? With sarcasm by the way, huh? I'm not sitting here as the heavy hours. Or fails to update seconds a page and wrote out, here S‰R°SЃ again and went all stupid comments to me, I do not MaG®tre, I proffi in these cases. Here are some facts: 1. Typically, 3D model in the movies, or even where once separated from the real, just shows it like a little lighter than that, whether real well, I personally see the difference. 2. is very well made video renderennye and where almost no difference, the factors that a poor quality video, a very good installation and renders - kasaemo films. And now with regard to this movie. 1. The model in general and animirovanna srenderena is not bad, alerted one time when he approached the water, not too painful estvestvennye divorce and Foday bryzki there, I saw vreale as they emanate from a helicopter over the water and on this I can try on these things . Second, it's good srenderena model was at one point shows that it is of course a computer model of how to say you can tell I have already mentioned that different from relaa on color, ie, like the subject a bit unnatural svetlovaty this issue, you will need to show how something. NI +, and he could not fly because if it went well, and probably would have turned and dived to 100%, but it has since almost unnaturally aligned. Here I sit reading, and I think that for me, so hated? No I am not in Yandex lazil, just something that I tried to understand and learn to 3D modeling, and even sat and watched, as do 3-D effects to video. I do not know how to tell you, but I can distinguish it all. Gorahdo difficult to distinguish the photoshop on the photo quality oknechno same as 3D video on the video more often than not give some of the factors which I listed under the numbers. Good luck.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
Even at skrinschote appended to the video shows a pair of those ridiculous water type sdumaemye "Reale they do not seem so, but I admit it masterfully assembling, though he and I immediately rushed to the eye.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
Swami did not argue, I will not believe that people moozhet on his experience to learn to distinguish between such things and I do not need it, and believe very much. There will be time, knocking on ICQ yet and a show about and rassskazhu. It is interesting and well okay, I know that I can distinguish it, and it pleases me. This way you can easily learn, if you watch a lot of interesting things.:)
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
2 fly-max Hold 5 + only person that is not covered in the media is garbage, simple ovidno consent of the same? Here is a man who was also unique, he learned to distinguish it, but you can not:) No, really seen it all, or at a graph of current in the film Jurassic Park 1 was barely visible and is still "almost" was noticeable, it is the truth easily distinguished. by the way in the movie Jurassic Park, it was not noticeable because there made robotic dinosaurs in the real value and frequently shot them.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
+1
The meaning of the word MaG®tre: Dictionary of foreign words MaG®tre - see meter *. The new interpretation of the dictionary word of Russian. By TF Efremova. MaG®tre m. 1) Teacher, tutor. 2) Anyone who has achieved in a liter. towards perfection. Orthographical Dictionary MaG®tre MaG®tre,-a (teacher, mentor) Explanatory Dictionary Ed. C. I. RћR¶RµRіRѕRІR° and N.Yu. Shvedova MaG®tre,-a, m. (knizhn.). 1. Teacher, tutor. Strict 2. Deyateliskusstva or science - revered authority among his students, svoegookruzheniya (often in the treatment or reference). You see, my dear fellow, I have made you a compliment, and you, in general, it agreed, calling himself a pro, but called my blunt statement. Where is the logic? What kind of hatred you are talking about? Tknite finger, where I allowed myself to speak to you offensive? Your comments on the substance of the matter is not so much on the higgledy-piggledy set out clearly and that of the 28 lines of text, I do not know for yourself anything interesting and new. Most alarming me your maniacal dislike of children. Almost every your comments, it is traced. What are you done? Do you have any - the emotions associated with that? You often allows himself to mock other people, always putting himself on the step above? Where such confidence that you are smarter or know what it? You allow yourself to teach others, when you requested to do so! So behave upstart! Be humble, respect other people, going to the land, your self-esteem is inflated. What you want to appear smarter, so you look stupid ...
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
2 KirillS let's not OK? Bulo jokingly said. I know the meaning of the word MaG®tre, just do not like this phrase much better "Guru" or "proffi, and MaG®tre my subway asotsiiruetsya.:) And I know his value is not a fool. I have called the part of a blunt speech, which was RЅR°RїRyoSЃR°RЅRЅR° sarcastically, namely, "Where are you? A-u-u-u! I impatience! Maybe you are looking for the answer in Google or Yandex? You all know." No? " compliment "MaG®tre" I have appreciated, thanks, just do not like sarcasm, here is a humorous remark, as I described in parentheses. For children there is no animosity, there is a dislike of certain maloletkam in this forum for their bad actions to me, I do not maloletka and not their age, to endure such ridicule. Often? There is not often, though such ets. I am not meant to ridicule, not correctly express that how would I want skzat and explain things and how to tell a man, and produced so that it looks like a sneer. Here's the truth, honestly say, I say that I can distinguish it, and you find it a sneer, well, you believe that I can distinguish in the 3d video is not on whether the eye? Yes or no? I am not going to be capital offense if you do not believe it, well do not believe, I know that I can distinguish, can provide examples and facts. On account of hatred, I just thought that you, as it often write to me sarcastically I just do not have anything, then okay. confidence in the entire 100% No, again I say, I did not put himself on stage earlier, just when I want to say something, or suggest to formulate sometimes not, sometimes it looks like a sneer, sometimes it is a sneer. I really do not degrade and do not want to offend. I will tell you the truth, I simply gimmick, if people do not know something, although I understand that this is normal and really do not know. Just at that moment when I read, tried to escape the first case comments that the type "haha as you do not know" I perfectly understand. But really, I am now interested in why you do not believe that I can distinguish a say in this video for an eye, th
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
Much of what is written not vlezlo. Blin:)
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
In general summary, KirillS you believe that people modet to distinguish it in the eye? Yes or no? I can, because I know the different factors, know how to distinguish. This is real and it is not difficult to learn to know the main thing that gives 3-D objects in the video.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
Yes, I believe you, calm down! I then saw how lished? Finish the dialogue! (See Licko) tchk.
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
Yeah, I graduated, too, look at Licko, responded.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
nestoit people believe everything seen ... a real photo-toad! I am sure 100% that it fuflo ... Under such a low bridge Mi-8 just would collapse ...
− Haker,
17 years ago,
#
And who here believes?
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
2 Haker nobody believed. He might not have collapsed, but so quickly would not exactly flying.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
Ohrenet. The essence of the debate believe Antoine whether he can distinguish the 3d-to-face. I think that it can not. I do not believe !!!!!!!
− susanin,
17 years ago,
#
Do not believe me, I can much.
− @ntuan,
15 years ago,
#
-2
fun to read comments after all pull together "Aviator" looked :)))))))
− RAID74,
17 years ago,
#
oops, sorry, it seems they were not aviators as "PE" on the NTV channel:)
− RAID74,
17 years ago,
#
creators of the video - off! can they now will work in Hollywood? :)
− RAID74,
17 years ago,
#