![](/file_images/103/thumb_img29342_1.jpg ""My first landing 747"")
type en 70
| Rating: 5!
+3
Well it must be so upset RLE: 1) the rise was at a rate far below the recommended 2) was off with the flaps retracted 3) would be carried off by two propellers with blade 4) FAC, ignoring the signal auasp, continued to pull on a wheel from an analysis of findings flight, the results of the field phase of the investigation, including aerial photography and drawing sketches AP sites, as well as fragments of the plane computation in real, data, transcripts of objective control, rzultatov experiment on the simulator en-70, ..., is established: 1) the aircraft was severely defective prior to departure 2) plane was filled with enough fuel quantity (1 liter, instead of the recommended 10 tons), 3) the aircraft was not equipped with an early warning system to the ground (taws), which further caused the AP 4) No certificate of airworthiness MAK Commission believes that , the immediate cause of the accident was incompetent assessment of their flight capacity, which led to major appliances neuchteny indicators, which led to the collision with the ground plane, its destruction and loss of reputation kvsea. recommendations for improving safety of flight: 1) to prohibit the flying AN-70 with two engines, loose 2) establish a system naa en 70 which will block the pitch up to take pg in the event the Sun Vr, agreed RLE 3) prohibit the flight without mechanization
− turboblufer,
15 years ago,
#
+2
An U-70 engines of 4 pieces. A bird pity ... : (
− TITAR,
17 years ago,
#
+2
There is a modification of the An-70-100 with two engines!
− Heinkel,
16 years ago,
#
The reason for this model - too much rear main landing gear, do not allow to gently lift the front foot at a speed run. In both seen sharp ups "undermining" and immediately take off the critical angle of attack ... Normally take off with this arrangement the main pillars of this model would always be problematic.
− ANRI,
14 years ago,
#
5
First off, and the first catastrophe .....+ 10
− SINED,
15 years ago,
#
5
For Video 5, and bird ... sorry!
− von_Stierlitz,
15 years ago,
#
5
Airplane sorry.
− alexnks,
16 years ago,
#
5
Too bad the plane, Acceleration, climb, stall, crash. We had to fly into the sun, then all the rules have been used.
− UHWW,
16 years ago,
#
5
Nothing will restore
− NikTroinik,
16 years ago,
#
5
sorry birds, the crew chipisy!
− pilot-bess,
16 years ago,
#
5
Still, why the 2 engine? For the video 5. Model pity = (Sam Modelist only poster.
− A.S.K.,
16 years ago,
#
They wind in the belly, not a problem. This is the sun, each instruction PC is a warning!
− DIR,
16 years ago,
#
Classroom model that was (((
− Blast94,
17 years ago,
#
Error in the sun, it sent overdo with the roll, the wind in the belly, down to the wing, the speed of decent treatment of ores pomoymu not changed, the height of a small, nowhere, boom.
− ROMANFLAIT,
17 years ago,
#
The last flight apparently true story noser, so it is well cast, well and in the end, after turning it all in the amount of additional silnepovliyalo at the event.
− VortexMX,
17 years ago,
#
While the WMS and rezgogo for high pitch, kind of did not expect to be the pilot maneuvers rassterennosti and lost control. ))
− VortexMX,
17 years ago,
#
5
I looked, the An-70, not only in reality, not luck, but in the models, too. It is a pity.
− Nikolay_Sukhikh,
17 years ago,
#
This is not the An-70, An-I or 26 or 32, the truth is unlikely the aircraft to any development of Antonov Design Bureau
− nagirny_vladimir,
16 years ago,
#
5
Daa sorry crew))
− martinov,
17 years ago,
#
5
Modelka was good and what actually happened, who I think?
− Борт174,
17 years ago,
#
5
And do not mind!)) Skleyut to new))
− Ivan_SS,
17 years ago,
#
5
Oh ... so sorry aircraft ....:(((
− UNKB,
17 years ago,
#
5
Very sorry .. :-(((
− Minigrand,
17 years ago,
#
5
The black boxes are deciphered? * CRAZY *
− Carim,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Yes! The reason for the accident - pilot stupidity!
− kammedia,
17 years ago,
#
+1
=)) Error crew if formally =))))))))
− Carim,
17 years ago,
#
5
((((((((((((((((((
− Lion King,
17 years ago,
#
5
Airplane pity. But the video super!
− B07,
17 years ago,
#
5
friend .... 5 for the video!
− daewooo,
17 years ago,
#
5
Too bad the model (a plane, it must be said )...(( And what was the power? And what engines?
− shrubb,
17 years ago,
#
Well, gasoline engines can be seen, the smoke can be seen, although hz, WMS another fuel. And even now, I think what stopped to take off normally.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
The human factor!
− Bakinez,
17 years ago,
#
Engine methanol, 4-stroke, 1,5 hp each.
− kammedia,
17 years ago,
#
Thank you. When is trying to do something, realize that even with a 2 stroke does not fly - ooooochen hard.
− shrubb,
17 years ago,
#
:`(((
− qip88,
17 years ago,
#
5
Hehehe, the author of the video that the camera does not svistel wind, it is necessary to invent paralonovuyu overlay on the microphone. Bednenky An-70, or rather something similar.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Shooting is not involved splitting the plane, why not prepare with microphones, etc. :-)
− kammedia,
17 years ago,
#
5
of course ... sorry for the video 5
− ZOLTAR,
17 years ago,
#