Landing on aircraft carrier
| Rating: 5!
Landing on the aircraft carrier, seen from the cockpit.
→ Size:
2 MB
→ Date:
18 years ago (27.01.2008 22:17)
→ Author:
Радик
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded:
1654 time(s)
5
cool
− olega154,
16 years ago,
#
5
t116 And we have at least ten years without garyuchki were ...
− Vitos,
18 years ago,
#
5
Yes, Viking ASW aircraft, about a professional comparison raids (logically), behind pendosovskih pilots (ie pilot pilots in GA) and two Yugoslavia Afghan Persian Gulf and we have that? So do not fool yourself teshte (unfortunately)
− t116,
18 years ago,
#
5
/ / /
− RIF,
18 years ago,
#
5
Gelmut So they are still in Afghanistan and a opertsiyu provernuli that much eye cut, well its god. Amerikosy they are in Africa Amerikosy, cho babble something about them)
− finka-05,
18 years ago,
#
5
Kuznetsov due to the lack of guns was able to deploy missile launch complexes.
− Пристав,
18 years ago,
#
I got less than: (69,4 m / s) / 3c = 23.1 m/s2 (23.1 m/s2) / (9.8 m/s2) = 2.4.
− -=dk=-,
18 years ago,
#
5
but there is a Discovery where all the best - the U.S. and the world they have won 2, so that the phrase about the Soviet newspapers is very controversial. cool movie
− Gelmut,
18 years ago,
#
5
I thought. If the data you have, are true, then an overload would order 8g
− shade1387,
18 years ago,
#
Most take laziness:), as well: when landing on "Kuznetsov" Braking from 250 km / h to 0 takes place for 3 seconds.
− ru_19_300,
18 years ago,
#
the fact that fuel zhrem at the start ... pendosy also R¶SЂSѓS‚ as there have said ... gun is triggered when a certain pressure on it ... which creates a traction engine at takeoff mode ... and there is less ... "RѕS„RyoRіRµRЅRЅR°SЏ" overload takeoff ... 2. our "springboard" is a means to combat the negative temperature ... Cannon amerikosovskogo ship steam / air ... so say draft cover band in 3-4 start to the many that already need to handle it ... we are not an obstacle ... about ORT and RTR ... do you think the CCN and the BBC are not analogues of ORT and the BBS? about overloading on the landing ... landing the Su-33 in the region of 260-240 kmch ... sredky weight man ... 75-85 km to stop with the zeros gakom hitch occurs at 25-30 meters ... If you remember the physics ... count is not difficult:) + kg 2-3 this helmet on R±RѕS?RєRµ ... so that the head is a separate topic
− fly-max,
18 years ago,
#
5
endoscop! on our aircraft carrier catapult role performed: otboynik behind and lifting the front off the site - so that the flow is no more than a catapult - because at the same catapult takeoff mode, rather than mg) and in general your pessimism, I do not like (you do not like me , Fyodor Mikhailovich) the rest: the people, where I is as to what a TV program about the deck aviation heard that when planting overload is so severe that it is not something that the retina in the eyes exfoliate and camcorder broken (the lens of the type of cracking or overload something like that ). This is interesting to me - in this video peregruzochka a God - and ran into the camera:) because samoleteg simpler? training "and write those who are in the thread topic - how many g about reloading on the brakes when the capture hook in takeoff? Roller liked:)
− RAID,
18 years ago,
#
The lack of catapults on aircraft carrier - it is not a Good, this is very bad. Somolet with this launch zhret enormous amount of fuel can not take on board enough fuel and weapons. So the take-off weight of the aircraft carrier from the Su-33 is not many more F-18, a radius of action and combat boot alas .. it does not boast it. I do not think that American pilots are flying in several times greater than our worst they probably vice versa. I recommend not to watch ORT and RTR do not read our press and did not take at face value tales of our pro-media
− endoscop,
18 years ago,
#
-2
Eat fecal respected. You still mum about our asses do not say? Ask! It will tell! Normal at our pilots flying. And what are you R±SЂRµRґSЏS‚RyoRЅSѓ and wheeze persecute this fool understand. Just look at least as shrink our pilots and theirs and then, then you tell me, kike.
− nasaspace,
16 years ago,
#
heh, that's srach! -1!
− Mihail Stepanov,
16 years ago,
#
The plane, rather similar to the S-3A VIKING (ASW aircraft). And everywhere there are good pilots, including us. A battle won is not the one who sits on the aircraft carrier is better, but someone who is better flying leads dogfight and intercepts goal. Even foreigners recognize that our pilots (I am not referring to yesterday's graduate schools), few in the world can posostyazatsya. By the way, if I recall correctly, F-18A in one and a half times more of the Su-33MK. Yes, and flight deck on the aircraft carrier would be it short, but there are no aerostarterov, our take off on their engines. So You have to compare. In numbers - they have more, but as a - this is an issue.
− disp-nrsk,
18 years ago,
#
Pilot, I read your thoughts;)
− Pilot_Tu134,
18 years ago,
#
5
The class, which may say a palubniki from pindosov silneyshie.Gde still like to see?
− Saprosha,
18 years ago,
#
5
Excellent. I understand an American aircraft carrier and plane A-6?
− ptenez,
18 years ago,
#
5
Cool!
− maybkot,
18 years ago,
#
5
that is, pancake, surprise! someone is reading my mind! myself watching him today and he wanted to lay out ....
− Пилот,
18 years ago,
#
5
Cool!
− minaevpa,
18 years ago,
#
-1
5
Well MEGA Bojan!
− korsar795,
16 years ago,
#