[Arrival to Kharkov | UKHH | B735 | Transaero | FS2004 HD]
→ Filename:
→ Date:
15 years ago (11.12.2010 02:01)
→ Author:
Artem Korsukov aka ArtSpotter
→ Approved by moderator:
AirArt
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
+4
[B | than | enjoy | write | this | read | title | video |? ]
− Stakan,
15 years ago,
#
Ponte)
− Pulkovsky_Pilot,
15 years ago,
#
+1
5
Cool!
− SERgan_747,
15 years ago,
#
5
Planting of the thing! I would repeat, if the scenario set:). And fails.
− pilot_an12,
15 years ago,
#
5
horosh_
− bronx,
15 years ago,
#
5
Excellent!
− sergpetr2,
15 years ago,
#
5
Worthily
− Neo6661045,
15 years ago,
#
5
With a soft landing! And with a title you yes, otzheg: D
− Nebes787,
15 years ago,
#
5
Oboldet!
− Андрэ,
15 years ago,
#
5
Beautifully
− skyteacher,
15 years ago,
#
5
Excellent!
− Pachtet,
15 years ago,
#
5
Okay, but: 1) shaking still a bit too much 2) Kharkiv, not Kharkov;)
− Ant0n1o,
15 years ago,
#
1) The picture alive, everything's cool! 2) By this logic, for example, Beijing city you call Beijing?)), Etc.
− BiXENON,
15 years ago,
#
The site is written ICAO Kharkiv. In schemes Jeppesen also Kharkiv.
− Jeka_M,
15 years ago,
#
5
say that the music
− A_lex,
15 years ago,
#
5
But I think a bit ahead of camera shake when the view from under the wing was.
− AlexW,
15 years ago,
#
5
wonderfully
− Q_ART,
15 years ago,
#
5
Very good fit, nice to see!
− Vladimir_76,
15 years ago,
#
5
krasyvo)
− alexost92,
15 years ago,
#
5
great video, great landing!))
− dimon-omon,
15 years ago,
#
5
I liked it .. good quality, priter myagenko! Set as well as the effect it quake camera?
− pro100sky,
15 years ago,
#
5
No words! (Truth UKHH Transaero never flightless)
− sanechek,
15 years ago,
#
-2
3
It's not even 5, but all 6! Minus 1 for the music. Minus 1 for the odd spelling of the title (I would like to trace the train of thought from the psychological point of view). Minus 1 for the illiterate "arrival to". Total: 3.
− Gladkov,
15 years ago,
#
Personally, I absolutely parallel to that in the header is written, most importantly, content, and it is a five-plus, or you better turd in a pretty wrapper? Go and see a movie again, what else could find fault with Mr. Gladkov?
− Vladimir_76,
15 years ago,
#