visual landing
| Rating: 4.4!
The first video. I look forward to: comments, feedback, suggestions and criticisms ... interested in piloting, and not the picture quality, as well as Oscar does not pretend ....
→ Size:
47 MB
→ Date:
17 years ago (15.04.2009 07:36)
→ Author:
olega154
→ Approved by moderator:
omega
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded:
495 time(s)
+1
3
The speed is high. Do not be so sharply on the steering wheel pull, hence the flight and hard landing. Yes, the height was small. Even a little bit of patience and userdstva and you.
− il-96,
17 years ago,
#
I am sure if the author pulled steering wheel foam to the aircraft.
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
+1
4
Video good. Liked it! Regarding planting: 1. Learning to properly carry out "box." In violation of all the instructions, you come to live almost on BPRM, although the pattern of your airport landing well to perform on the rules of entry - at least 15km before BPRM. 2. Earlier than should have been, complied with the alignment, resulting in a "Drawdown" at altitudes above 3 meters ... Landing, of course, smooth and good, but this posadochka living Paksi on board falls under the responsibility of the expression "foreign exposure in the life of danger performance of official duties "as well as St271. "Violation of the rules of international flights:) I'm only kidding, but in every joke ... :) Good luck in future work!
− RAID74,
17 years ago,
#
Thanks, taken ... tried to repeat the "feat" of commanders we have now written-off TU-154-x. Very often, as they watched from the bushes and flies directly in the face, exciting spectacle. Now they are the same on Bobik do. But before they even ochn far)))
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
A question can be? I saw a configured device KURS MP I;) In general posadochka it was not visual;)
− mixxel,
17 years ago,
#
When you visit do not need visual access to preplant live at a distance of 15 km. With regard to criminal news, you are wrong at least. If it is approached as a prosecutor, many crews would have sat. There are other nuances.
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
5
Normalek
− nagirny_vladimir,
17 years ago,
#
4
.
− Борт174,
17 years ago,
#
4
Perelet.Zhestkost.Skorost. To get started, not bad ...
− PILOT85,
17 years ago,
#
Again, stiffness ... I hesitate to ask, and you file the INEM, the author asked, what would make such conclusions? That I so out of curiosity ...
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
Do not be shy! If the author wants to evaluate its flight - do not need video, you need to INEM data, as well - "Mom, look - I'm going without hands!"
− КурсМП,
17 years ago,
#
By rigidity - uv.Kesson I mean "tin" of landing that the pilot put the plane immediately after the rotation, no exit on the glidepath. I think video confirms my slova.Udachi.
− PILOT85,
17 years ago,
#
I agree that little video is suitable for a constructive evaluation of parameters of flight. Hence the question arises - what is judged on the basis of the rigidity of landing? Okay, drive =)
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
Personally, from experience, if not possible to go on ILS, using all possibilities of the aircraft to maximum: entry and orientation to beacons, speed autothrottle, vertikalka too, steering wheel podpravlyaetsya course only because steering wheel is easier than automatic schemes to comply with the vizualki can be. As a conclusion: for the visual guidance, manual control Rood, ailerons and elevator put a firm 5, Safety-two loosely, with 180 passengers on board the 70-ton machine tending down so do not joke, do not put an overall assessment unnecessarily afraid she will be lower than you now. and another question how do you like this going when weather Sozh minimum category of the 3rd Chapter of ICAO for example:?
− Rustaveli,
17 years ago,
#
The visual setting is carried out under visual conditions. It is a third category of ICAO?
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
and another question how do you like this going when weather Sozh minimum category of the 3rd Chapter of ICAO for example:? - Logically schemes and devices
− Anton789,
17 years ago,
#
But the conversation about the visual, not instrumental entry. Will other conditions, would be another type of call. The third category is the RFP, and not ETA.
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Rustaveli, judging by the fact that you have written, more like what you do in the booth, take. I agree 70 ton machine that is not joke, if it does not chustvuyut ...
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
Autothrottle at planting???? And this is when writing to RLE instruction WTO such font: autothrottle use in recruitment, and reducing the planting strictly prohibited :))))))) leader - you have killed me outright:))) the third category of ICAO - generally brought to the grave: )))
− RAID74,
17 years ago,
#
You can see section RLE, which is written, that may not be used on the AT board? TU-154 is admitted to the 3 categories?
− f380,
17 years ago,
#
5
R›RyoS…R° trouble - the beginning!
− Anton789,
17 years ago,
#
5
Liked)
− kniaz777,
17 years ago,
#
5
well done, do not talk to glidepath. quality is not really, but if the author has acknowledged this and asked him not to evaluate, then 5 +!
− lokdok,
17 years ago,
#
as possible in Licko, or both to indicate which programs are necessary for the production of quality movies? the main sound is killing me ...
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
canopus pro coder! first kick of the editor-in-avi (good quality with a normal 44bitnym sound), then kanopusom zhmesh to wmv with ticks variable bitrate and two-pass encode. Good luck!
− RAID74,
17 years ago,
#
And kill me - you first need to upload a file, and then ask the Board. Holy man RAID - every day, keeping calm, lazy writes the same thing - Kanopus Encoder Pro, AVI, Tu Pass ...
− КурсМП,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Thanks to this holy man of the next tape!
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
5
Study and try!
− pulkovo2,
17 years ago,
#
3
Speed overstated specifically. Hence, the MA is unhealthy for glissady.Za 3. And like the rules =)
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
Specifically why? flaps 28, the speed of 290-270 .....
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
Well firstly just sorry - did not see that at 28, thought at 45. Speed (I assume that, because of the low-resolution video so it seemed) was 300 all the way. The question - hence the decision to land with flaps 28? You do not think that I'm trying to show off one, just interesting =)
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
personally I have a better turn out high-speed landing, when the 45 aircraft that is "running" and the course and on glidepath ... yet little is transmitted is not an important factor, more than once flew in the cockpit and watched a couple of times imeno this entry: speed 300, flaps 28 on the line is already clear up rate regime ...
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
Maybe so, the matter personally. But IMHO, much more beautiful, pleasant and smooth go to the flap 45. Rezhimchik where the 82-string set and forget about it, well up protsentik add-sdernut. But how to =) And like the movie)
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
thanks! boom to try!
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
4
Dovorot nearly if not over ends, caring for small gas-delayed perelet.Lihachestvo for the first time is not bad!
− duna,
17 years ago,
#
Why lihachestvo ... Just do not say, but a year ago flew on the same Talagi (as in video) of SHRM in B2, so went the same way)
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
Of course, this is not surprising, so really go. But this is a flagrant violation. But come. This past season and about the criminal responsibility of the crew wrote. So what. Flies well and all. Although certainly not so. Read again Ershova.
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
And what do you have about the violation?
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
To Kesson: The following is written RAID74: St271. "Violation of the rules of international flights." - Thence, and took:)
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
=))) Humor appreciated =)
− Kesson,
17 years ago,
#
5
RќRyoS?S‚SЏRє! Go! Be better
− Владимир Пахомов,
17 years ago,
#
5
For such a simulation run at 4.5. Molodets! The only requirement to be on the line to strip completely stabilized for at least 500 feet (150 meters is the usual recommendation for the company's visual approach). Therefore, in this case, you must go to the second round. But the efforts-well done! Experience and expertise there. By the way the trees in the area call for the 100 meters in height, you can not ignore them, they simply can not be. Good luck in the future.
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
4
.
− Tu134,
17 years ago,
#
4
RAID74 +1
− >LeadeR<,
17 years ago,
#
5
Norm!
− HaN,
17 years ago,
#
5
for the first video is not bad, good call, of course, all poheril, but went well, and a little tree did not cling to dangerously fly:)))
− elf,
17 years ago,
#
5
Excellent Quality! voot a run in the style of Kai-Tak neochen good! But for the first time a well -
− F.C.M.K,
17 years ago,
#
shimmering earth for you an excellent quality?)))
− sturmgewher,
17 years ago,
#
4
zhestkovato, and entry can be seen on the instrument was made and, if so, could direct the band White beforehand, rather than dovorachivat at the last minute ....... the more time flying in a straight line the more time to think:)
− GeK397,
17 years ago,
#
-2
If I may say so, it is not a visual posadka.Vot such earlier aeroflotovskie 154th in Tripoli on the fourth turn at an altitude of 20 meters served, so that no assessment
− KIVLAR,
17 years ago,
#
-2
Not visually, you can see all the devices show. Yes, and flight, need to train! And to have guidance, orientation, at least on the sun or lakes.
− @ntuan,
17 years ago,
#
Do you think that, when entering the visual devices are used. On the flight course must poostorozhney, but this is at the discretion of the captain in such a weather conditions.
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
I also thought that the devices are not used in the visual, not a gift as you start puts "off" looking through binoculars. There gdenit topic or article on this subject, RєRyoRЅSЊS‚Rµ sylochku RїR»RyoR·
− mixxel,
17 years ago,
#
+4
visual setting is a common practice flights, and equipment used in their entirety. The difference that you can not fulfill completely the scheme, plus disposal of other VS responsibility for the crew. About the visual setting, you can read here: http://www.aviadocs.narod.ru/icao/final_2.htm
− isc,
17 years ago,
#
+2
http://www.dmpmos.ru/laws/DocumShow.asp?DocumID=141907&;DocumType=63, here too there is about a visual ...
− olega154,
17 years ago,
#
Thank razyasnili)
− mixxel,
17 years ago,
#
Thank razyasnili)
− mixxel,
17 years ago,
#