Raschet Davleniya ver 3
| Rating: 4!
3 - version of the utility calculation of pressure Aerodrome! Added presentation of QNH in hPa and many small improvements. Conveniently who takes the data from METAR!
→ Size:
9 KB
→ Date:
15 years ago (09.09.2010 17:43)
→ Author:
→ Approved by moderator:
omega
→ License:
License file included in archive
→ Downloaded:
985 time(s)
+1
3
Again. NET. You can, and no buttons have been dispensed with, so the user convenience to create.
− Jethawk,
15 years ago,
#
Who broke into the place. NET, prepisal with C #, C + +. Teper.NET not required. Http://narod.ru/disk/24870585000/Raschet_Devleniya_3__.rar.html Link
− Vetal__,
15 years ago,
#
Lord, for whom is this intended utility and what its purpose in the world of MSFS?
− BAe-146,
15 years ago,
#
Looking for that would equate altimeters to the airfield landing! For example you have a height of 700 feet of the airfield, a dispatcher for the Atis said pressure - 29.92 (usually if there is nothing in the sime not change it so) (if it is another to make a acc. An amendment to the prog). We introduce a progressive height and get the pressure airport landing. This pressure altimeters to introduce "Projects Tupolev TU 154" for example, and upon landing they will show 0 and at lower altitude will be issued on the airfield. Altimeters should always equate to the airfield landing!
− Vetal__,
15 years ago,
#
That I think is not to put a count of the phrase "altimeters must always be equated to the airfield landing" ... A "project" - what's that word mean?
− Gladkov,
15 years ago,
#
"Projects Tupolev thinks a bit different pressure than the real, if you fly on it daw stake there.
− Vetal__,
15 years ago,
#
And what about you before boarding, when for years in Russia, not to equate, and keep the pressure above the sea level?
− Vetal__,
15 years ago,
#
Yes, if I use credit default controller, keep the pressure above sea level, because when vectoring manager should indicate the height to hold under the pressure is on QNH, and when he brings to the final approach ("intercept localizer"), then put QFE has no meaning, since further leads me Instrument landing system, and the CDF is determined by the altimeter. If I'm flying in the network, the managers themselves give QFE and did not need to rearrange. If I'm flying without a general manager, it's all Fake. Nevertheless, if the flights without manager ATIS gives the pressure QNH, then the schemes Jeppesen given height to both types of pressure, so senseless that any recount. And the word "project" in the Russian language does not exist, but you is not even understood from a hint.
− Gladkov,
15 years ago,
#
a Vet @ l__: What to do with the other two versions?
− ___Yura,
15 years ago,
#
In principle, you can delete everything except this one! The first truth does not require the NET, but for some strange work, and all that is in the second all there and then!
− Vetal__,
15 years ago,
#
ok, the old version is deleted.
− ___Yura,
15 years ago,
#
5
View more recalculate pressure who are interested in our site: http://www.aviagroup-eduard.com/forpilotspilotiem.htm
− isc,
15 years ago,
#