TU 144 V 1.9
| Rating: 5!
Updated 2d cockpit, hydraulically adjusted (more fluid motion and LV elevons), more realistic system for cushioning and braking wheels, etc.
→ Size:
22 MB
→ Date:
15 years ago (10.01.2011 17:21)
→ Author:
alshe
→ Approved by moderator:
isc
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded:
2848 time(s)
+1
That the author had done with engines, not only does not correspond to the Tu-144 - is contrary to the laws of physics, fuel consumption is so low that even the current envy bypass engines, let alone the real engines of the Tu-144, and craving - after takeoff, you can shove upward picking up thousands of km / h to nearly open-space (in airplanes did in the 60's! in lights like! learn modern engineers minders!). Cannot is that there are very (several times!) Underestimated the number of fuel consumption, and the turbofan engine that works - at sea level thrust of 100% and with increasing altitude immediately begins to decrease gradually and in the stratosphere is ten times less than at the level of Sea. Here so - engines operate without loss of capacity with 100% thrust to an altitude of 20 km! - "Critical height" instead of 00.000 is 62,000 ft. Not only is "low height" instead of 00.000 is 15,000 ft - that is, less than 5 km thrust exceeds 100% of this, and at sea level, such as minus 5km underground. The author is from these figures and why they were introduced? You did not seem strange behavior such aircraft? Especially when you're as much engine power had to turn down three times than the present Tu-144 and he still continues to fly like a rocket.
− FL600,
15 years ago,
#
Perhaps with the engine I nakosyachil. I still do not parse all the parameters of PM (especially why the critical and low height of the engines should be equal to 0), do not argue. But I installed the cravings experienced by the machine must develop 2,34 m at an altitude of 50,000 feet and at lower power - he did not develop.
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
PS As for fuel economy - try to afterburning gazanut - you and 15 minutes of passage, crashing to the ground with empty fuel tanks
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
|"Critical height" 0 because all the turbo-jet engines in the world (including turbojet Tu-144) critical height 0! Any TPD maximum capacity specified by the manufacturer develops at sea level and starts snezhatsya to climb with every meter of rise because of declining atmospheric pressure is less and less power - only so, but you've got there to a height of 63,000 feet of continuous power. "Low Height" is the height at which the engine will operate at 100% capacity specified in the "power" - this is only possible at sea level - specified by the manufacturer the maximum engine power it develops at sea level - meaning "low height" = 0 feet , another number there can be no, if there entered number is not zero, and the number, then it distorts the specified value of engine power in a big way, your 15,000-foot entered there, are doing so that the engines specified in the "power" (which is specified by the manufacturer for sea level) are developing at an altitude of 15,000 feet, rather than at sea level as they should, and below 15,000 feet, they develop more power than specified in the "power" to short the model is really up to its name (the Tu-144) and was not a suborbital spaceship able to fly more hours without refueling is necessary to put the following values: | | in the "critical height" = 0 | | in the "low height" = 0 | | in the "max thrust" = 33069 | | in the "pull farsazhnaya" = 11,023 | | in both places, "fuel consumption at low altitudes» = 0.850 | | in both places, "fuel consumption at high altitudes" = 1.560 (instead of 10 times less like yours) | | in the "drag coefficient" for shell = 0.05 (not 0.09) | | in the "fuel" = 194447.7 (not 120000.0) | | in a window «Vne» 600 (not 999) | |
− FL600,
15 years ago,
#
Thanks, I'll try!
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
Put these parameters. Something he can not go Mach 1 at an altitude of 45,000 feet. Temperature of -90 Celsius - could out of it? Can all still raise a little traction above?
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
|No cravings do not need to raise. I have not noticed that the drag coefficient of the additional bodies still standing - moving the nose cap to the cockpit (extra Bldg 1), as well as additional Bldg 2, 3 and 6 do not stick out beyond the cross-sectional fizyulyazha and found him in a single design, and accordingly improper to have their own drag - and it stands there and a lot, just in X-Plane all surfaces and objects are counted separately, regardless of their relative location, even if they overlap each other in the stream - as fizyulyazh and forward this cap. And additional korp4 and 5 which are part of engine nacelles must have very little resistance, since when operating in the mode of power engine nacelles have little resistance because of suction of air in them (they did not cut, but inside is), and idling in flight, when the pull of the resistance should be removed, but it creates a window area of the compressor with the number entered back to this area in the "engines". To make it all as it is necessary to maintain the following values: | fizyulyazha resistance (as already written) = 0.05 (this is its total resistance to be in such a geometric body as fizyulyazh Tu-144) | | Resistance additional korp1 = 0.001 | | Resistance additional korp2 = 0.001 | | Resistance additional korp3 = 0.001 | | Resistance additional korp4 = 0.010 | | Resistance additional korp5 = 0.010 | | Resistance additional korp6 = 0.001 |
− FL600,
15 years ago,
#
At such an altitude of 45000 feet at speeds of 1M air speed and therefore the pressure of air compressors and small engines gasping for better overclocking you need to dial 1 M (or less) at an altitude of 40,000 feet to tilt the plane nose down and because of the gravity plane would break up almost immediately breaking 1M, and dropping in a dense layer of the atmosphere - air velocity and air pressure on the compressors and engines will be a big raskochegarit, and if the transition to a positive vertical speed to keep the airspeed high (slightly nose up the aircraft during climb), then set the maximum speed (2.35M) will be fast and sure, and after its set you can dial a cruising altitude (above does not exceed airspeed of 600 knots).
− FL600,
15 years ago,
#
Shells I immediately put all 0.05. Try to reduce further resistance, but on landing it accordingly will not be adequate to extinguish the speed. Chosen for the vertikalke 2000 ft / min. at the maximum air speed of 600 knots. After 30,000 feet moved to 1000 ft / min, and then permanently diminish it to 0. K 40000 airspeed dropped to 280-260, the plane turned to subsonic barrier - a half load of fuel and more speed is not gained by any means
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
Yes, it does not accelerate, even if the "resistance fizyulyazha" put the 0.030 and it is unclear that it slows down, so I have a Concord - very similar to the Tu-144 machine for the size, weight, engine power of his "resistance fizyulyazha" is 0.040, it really do not have those extra bodies - only fizyulyazh, engine nacelles, and wing keel (but in fact the Tu -144 have extra bodies removed Resistance), Concord at the same time much more slowly climbs to 40000, and speed up to 1M than the Tu-144, but after overcoming 1M 2M normally gathers at a cruising height of 50,000 - 54,000 (all tests Tu-144 and Concord, I spent a full take-off weight that they also correspond to each other).
− FL600,
15 years ago,
#
By the way in X-plane in defoltnogo B-747 (comparable to the thrust of the TU-144) is thrust 63300
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
5
About how! already exist elevons!
− Roma1364,
15 years ago,
#
There are still a
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
Like 60 years already.
− Стэнли Подзабор,
15 years ago,
#
5
VC, VC, VC ...
− Petrucho,
15 years ago,
#
Patience friends;) Based on my plane is likely to make a model in AC3D
− alshe,
15 years ago,
#
Oh, at shorter)
− TECHNO MAN,
15 years ago,
#