Il96-400 v4 - FS2004 Aircrafts

Il96-400 v4 | Rating: 4.3!

FS2004 Aircrafts

Author of the model and part liveries is Kirill Konovalov, Igor Darashkevich part liveries (aka VortexMX). The model is laid out with the permission of the author.

→ Size: 149 MB

→ Date: 15 years ago (22.10.2010 20:54)

→ Author: Кирилл Коновалов,Игорь Дарашкевич(а.к.а. VortexMX).

→ Uploaded by: kasser17 (uploaded 15 files )

→ Approved by moderator: SLAVJAN

→ License: Freeware - Free version, Do Not Redistribute

→ Downloaded: 10608 time(s)

Comments 18 View ZIP-Content Download

Who are dissatisfied do better. Language every much. Model 96-300 decent but I liked more. Thanks to the author for work! − AiRDimon, 15 years ago, #

http://lurkmore.ru/images/9/9d/Dobeisa.jpeg − mikuz, 15 years ago, #

Tell me, is difficult three Scrin meet: appearance, 2D panel and VC if any? Well, why not do everything for the people? Assessment is not my, download - take a look. − ARTMOTO63, 15 years ago, #

It is not necessary (well, not worth post-test). Mikuz put it quite right. − JurijEDDS, 15 years ago, #

Put 5 so as respect and know all your work. Question, and do the same on your web site is the same or better? Rock or what? − SuVitalik, 15 years ago, #

Better "or". − JurijEDDS, 15 years ago, #

Excellent modelka! Author +5, very pleased and do not care how old she was. Done perfectly! − NitroEx, 15 years ago, #

Thank you! for works on a model that would not have said ... . − alex19620, 15 years ago, #

На 10 пойдет? − AlexanderKartash, 11 years ago, #

Визуально туда-сюда, а панель - на редкость убогое говнище. Лучше уж сразу от дефолтного 747 прикрутить было. − Dow_Jones, 13 years ago, #

почитал комментарии и форум,глюк на глюке. и качать передумал:D − pilot154-, 13 years ago, #

Отлетал 15 часов в VATSIM-е на этой модели и на этой панели - ни одного глюка.Это вы такие. − Mordor96, 13 years ago, #

Чему там глючить? Все дефолтное. − Dow_Jones, 12 years ago, #

А почему текстуры фюзеляжа мыльные?Не подкажете ? − DoctorWax, 14 years ago, #

За труд.... − Alexander71191, 14 years ago, #

thanks − Ivan_UOOO, 14 years ago, #

what's the problem? Posed model, and the choice it gives me that is missing two files gauges! − ice97, 15 years ago, #

I have the same joint. Just click on the message of Gough OK and everything goes like clockwork:) − Ил-86110, 15 years ago, #

you are the best !!!!! − малый, 15 years ago, #

Excellent! I liked it))) Thank you! − igorvp72, 15 years ago, #

works fine in both FS9 and FSX So that's just the control panel in virtual cockpit pochetche and then alienated a little bit and can not see anything and even with reloading something namudrili − Sidorovich1945, 15 years ago, #

everything is fine! download, install, fly))) − Rulez, 15 years ago, #

Respect other people's labor and time)))) − коржик, 15 years ago, #

-4

Как можно за ТАКОЕ УГ ставить 5?????
mikuz ты лучший!!! − Zoon, 14 years ago, #

Толсто, очень толсто. − 86110, 14 years ago, #

-4

It's just shit. Although the X-Plane for a money request. − mikuz, 15 years ago, #

why shit? specific you can? that it is not so? and whether there is a better model of the IL-96-400? − Karstar, 15 years ago, #

Why so insulting people. Kirill Konovalov is a very good modeler. At the time of his series of IL-96 best. And the fact that spoil the look cartoonish texture, it matters to the artist. In addition, if an aircraft assembly work on the whole world, to gather a normal panel, the sounds, you get very even ... Vizualka itself on the level. − Sanovich, 15 years ago, #

Vizualka can and at the level (otherwise set to 1), but these vizualok have nowhere to go. The rest - blah-blah-blah, the whole world to work ... heard more than once. And yet - devices from the A320. Hence - 2. − mikuz, 15 years ago, #

+54

mikuz, I was on a much better opinion of you ... You gave the impression of adequate human 1). I VIZUALSCHIK, understand? I then had no one but himself, agree that what happened with me all the same a little better than a similar model Samborski, also made "on the knee" out of nothing? 2). This model, God forbid memory, 4-year-old. This is my first project. 3). This model in its time been evaluated, and it is laid out here, because users asked for download from the site of the project many uncomfortable because of the speed and volume. And not for that, it would be evaluated in terms of contemporary realities. Would it be so incomprehensible? 4). And perhaps most important. No one gave you the right to insult me (and you are essentially just that and have done). I-would not be writing this if-you would just put 2 arguments, because with today's point of view, the model really is not a masterpiece (but still better than 96, for Sim, by the way ...) Yeah, I did not then have the programmer them, and now the afternoon with fire under this project is not found, even if there are documents (and then it was not). I have made these devices that-be there at least something was over empty sockets. In general, do not expect this attitude from you ... As for "... vizualok nowhere to go ..." Nobody's fault that programmers Sima unit. Yes modelers a little more, not at all enough programmers ... − Kirill Konovalov, 15 years ago, #

As they say do not like, do not eat. Faute de mieux it is worthy of IL-96, though not perfect. − Anthony, 15 years ago, #

Yes, you harp on the same string - insulted, humiliated? Where have I offended you? Visual model I'm interested in at the last turn (you also find it an insult?), And I just laid out adequately evaluate the entire file. And the word "shit" is exactly what you have written - from today's point of view of the model (not visual!) Actually not a masterpiece. You propose to put 5 in fact "putting some" or almost defoltntsyu panel with instruments from the A320? Or can a texture without alpha channel five put? Or for that - http://savepic.ru/1901494.jpg? Incidentally, one of the programmers (of which one), one of the causes of loss of interest in the sim, called the dominance of fans of visual effects. − mikuz, 15 years ago, #

Anthony, if the evaluation will ask only those who like it, it will be inadequate assessments. − mikuz, 15 years ago, #

+10

To mikuz: "The rest - blah-blah-blah, the whole world to work ... have heard more than once." - So that would not be sitting and waiting with a 3.14-sea weather, and themselves would take and even started to do something useful. − VortexMX, 15 years ago, #

mikuz, but you do better? If yes, then let's here, if not, close the bread slicers! This with all due respect to you! Airplane worthy! Dynamics - well, somewhere there's flaws, to get accustomed to the aircraft MUST! I too on IL-86 from Kirill Konovalov did not know how to fly, learn! Texture vizualka panel - 5!. Here - a bit of work if there is a programmer, the pilot of a second aircraft. And so I put a 5! Thanks for the model, and you mikuz fly on credit default 747 and rejoice! − toxin_pilot, 15 years ago, #

Granted, at 747 defoltnogo panel slightly better. − mikuz, 15 years ago, #

it's what you think! − toxin_pilot, 15 years ago, #

mikuz, I understand what you're trying to say. And I do not propose to (God forbid) put 5. Model in modern terms to "5" certainly does not hold. And I am strongly in favor elaborate systems. No, not numbered. I thought it a gross insult your statement, I said, not your position, the form in which this position has been expressed. But your position - better than units without vizualki vizualka without instruments I can not take 100%. Rather - like this: If I were not modelers - would not accept. Fortunately I am and they can to any instrumental complex, bude this will make a model. But ordinary, then simmer it can not do. − Kirill Konovalov, 15 years ago, #

Textures can here DOWNLOAD! And nefig yell - "textures are bad! Killed a blah! in general, go look for the textures! And you may have that happen. − toxin_pilot, 15 years ago, #

Kirill Konovalov, "rude saying" no rules are not violated, this is my personal opinion (and valuation) - hostility do not feel, with a file read, the protest did not have, so that everything is in order. But ordinary simmer also be able to do and devices for vizualki. Although ordinary simmer like toxin_pilot, these devices are not really something and need. To take screenshots for the theme of "My screens do not judge strictly" no device is needed. − mikuz, 15 years ago, #

Guys, you all look at this website commercials years ago, and 4.5 today! Personally, I already got the "calculations" type: "Rate my flight, and all sorts of video from every angle! It is commendable of course, that people have mastered the files of video editing and has almost all the director's! But the theme site just FS. I want to ask: is this open source simulator meets all requirements in your scripts or airplanes? I think not. And the nonsense that pours an endless stream of faylohranilische already caused only compassion for those who have this symmetry yuzaet. By the way you did not notice that really talented people who create or attempt to create a real need, have left the site and just looking and laughing at us!? Seems not to criticize those without those!! − sib2217, 15 years ago, #

Tu-154B2

Tupolev ANT-6A-4M34FRNA v1.0

IL-86 beta-2

tu-22m3 panel

Mesh water Kapchagai

AN225YT_xp11

Tupolev ANT-6A-4M34FRNA v1.0