ANTONOV An-12BK for 2004 version 2
| Rating: 4.9!
5
Thank you!
− rassel,
17 years ago,
#
5
THANK YOU!
− Pirozhenko Evgeny,
17 years ago,
#
5
SUPER!
− radist,
17 years ago,
#
5
And nothing else!
− A.S.K.,
17 years ago,
#
What differs from the previous one? Yes, and then to the panel as the atoms in the prideduschey it was too prostinkaya.
− bf109,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Very long time I waited etot plane, and I would very much like to shtoby there was a panel of PT. but otherwise, all super especially vizualka! And for the grammar please forgive me because life is very little use of Russian language, in Germanium, in russischer Sprache zu praktizieren es ist unm
− bf109,
17 years ago,
#
In this case, offer you my sincere apologies. I could not assume that a person writes in another country and just do not know the language. It seemed to me that it is written is not very educated, and not very puzzle-aviation person. Once again, forgive me. Well, as far as the panel, so there is no start the engines, but otherwise all the features implemented, but this is an amateur. Thank you for your interest in this samloetu.
− Александр Доронин,
17 years ago,
#
Thank you very much for what I understand.
− bf109,
17 years ago,
#
5
If it could, dropped to remake Bush Flying! Karoshy motel!
− Disappear,
17 years ago,
#
5
Vladimir, thank you for your work!
− JaMoS,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Thank you very much, just beauty - 5!
− olega625,
17 years ago,
#
5
Very pleased. Transferred tekturki in DX3, work on the film. I think the momentum will communicate, as well as with the An-24, will be SUPER. Thank you very much for the plane!
− Sanovich,
17 years ago,
#
Until that assessment is no place I will not, because there are issues: all found in the manual, but why is it 3D booth not drawn completely. (the first version, all drawn) is pilots are drawn, and the panel all white ... and look at the cabin with the outside too kazhet ... Toli is something I have not determined whether it zalet:) Give a decision, then the assessment will be put.
− ARTMOTO63,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Decision - to look inside the archive. The general pattern (such as the panel) have a separate folder. Add them to the livery, which use it.
− Sanovich,
17 years ago,
#
Yes, everything seems to manul something and you did not read ... I requested it - won four topics below, and within the manual 5 times as written - please read the very first - and only then in a panic and would not be stupid questions - need to copy the texture - of course without them everything would be white ... In fig I score - as it should be better to install and fly to health!
− zh03,
17 years ago,
#
All found the plane like, thanks
− ARTMOTO63,
16 years ago,
#
5
Thank you great!
− AleksLush,
17 years ago,
#
5
A masterpiece!
− soft,
17 years ago,
#
5
Waited!
− cokol,
17 years ago,
#
-1
4
Normally that's just vizualka not illuminated at night
− Burik,
16 years ago,
#
+1
nice man!, I'm flying the AN-12 3goda and as I know backlight never use! so that for such a delusion! set 4 is not respect for the author!
− radist,
16 years ago,
#
-2
5
In my opinion, excellent dynamics and sound! Felt a real pilot of Antonov 12BK!
− Oleg22,
17 years ago,
#
-5
1
-
− krepeerboss_737_,
10 years ago,
#
-6
4
4, where the light in the cr?
− Wlad90,
16 years ago,
#
-Effect of must put down as indicated in the manual - and you will be light in the VK
− zh03,
16 years ago,
#
-6
3
The model of course is nothing but the most inconvenient raspihivat all the folders that there is to prescribe in what files. Can you make a normal package such as PT TU154. All in one fell swoop at the shelf, and works as S‡R°SЃRyoRєRyo. On the panel problem, the high, this is generally from the default Cessna.
− bazxa,
16 years ago,
#
+1
Dear author! And if you can not in folders raspihat buy C-130 where the installer!
− CCCP-11156,
16 years ago,
#
+1
* EPA to his C-130? he asks to make installer for the An-12, instead of buying a C-130
− kiril_85703,
15 years ago,
#
-12
3
Vizualka, the quality of the panels is not very much!
− FlyPT!,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Sorry! PT is also not built in!
− Vlad Zaitsev,
17 years ago,
#
-16
3
Vizualka may very well, but 70% of systems and related devices are not implemented. Disappointing!
− Mandein,
17 years ago,
#
+8
70%? - But that had yet to realize-in coffee machine germokabine?
− zh03,
17 years ago,
#
+6
Tell a formula by which the percentage of capacity sold systems do, something higher mathematical
− Disappear,
17 years ago,
#
+2
What are you pretending to fools?? You know perfectly well that the aircraft was not soot.realnym systems? If you do not believe me, look at pictures of real An-12 and can understand the difference
− kiril_85703,
15 years ago,
#
-19
2
Your model for loading does not conform to the real model ... and the ceiling with a maximum weight too .. work on it
− kolpakov_79,
16 years ago,
#
Download the dynamics of the V10! http://www.avsim.su/forum/topic/70511-an-12-v-zhigulskogo/page__st__340__p__1110630 & # entry1110630
− LainerRRW,
16 years ago,
#
+2
Once, not very veritsya man who never learned to write correctly ... What is there in "zazruzki?"
− zh03,
16 years ago,
#
+1
"Seems unlikely" is written without the soft sign:)
− Andrei Lavrenov,
16 years ago,
#
Sorry ... That's right - "believe." Otozh ... But the dynamics are quite satisfied with me, excuse me, the copyright - and in my practice, a sim with 95 years there were not one side, which is something I do not reworked - quietly and peacefully took, and adjusted to what you think is right -- without pritenzy authors, if something in the model-remake S…RѕS‡RµS‚SЊSЃSЏ mean it, I still liked it, so not for nothing that the authors of the night pored over it - and forward, flew ... So I do not scold it is so old - in fact very simple (although sometimes the worst) to remake diniamiku, texture - if you are everyone can do - so if you develop a model was important - trehmerka, vizualka - it will not be undone, so all who are not satisfied with these two components - alas, I totally disagree - well, not nravitsmya - so take - and reshape - you and cards in your hand - it would be that predelyvat!
− zh03,
16 years ago,
#