If the disaster is, hence subject is. Sure, you can try this not govorit.Kak ostrich head in the sand to hide. But the ass would be on ulitse.Vy confident in its safety?? So the issue was and will be!
− susanin,
16 years ago,
#
+2
I can make mistakes and do not argue. At the nerves act in what spirit smontirovno video. If neshnl Geographic inquiry look like a documentary, there's soap drams.
− alel5,
16 years ago,
#
+2
At the traffic police office in Naro, broken in snot machine is out in three tiers. Seen as pulling their slaughtered corpses. Here's a montage for us with you. This vaccine. A vaccine is not painless!
− susanin,
16 years ago,
#
+7
5
Question remains about 24 August 2004, when "blown" 2 aircraft. First, the head of the FSB Public Relations Center said that "the basic version ... which resulted in a criminal case ... it's 263 article" Inappropriate use of rail, air and water transport, that is, roughly speaking, is the wear technology and the human factor, and then reporters (!) found that "for a few moments before the explosion, the pilot managed to signal SOS" and soon the wreckage had been found traces of RDX-attack! "And those 2 girls," witnesses "who allegedly saw the flash ( explosion) in the sky. Even the terrorists without inspection on board were ... Cheto does not fit it all ...
− ILAS,
16 years ago,
#
+3
Film strashilka, expected for mass audience, therefore blunders and outright garbage there abound.
− TwoS,
16 years ago,
#
about lyapy - this really is full of ((...
− dinsoft,
16 years ago,
#
The movie proves once again that while the state will naplevatelski relate to civil aviation, we will be crash ((((((((
− Шубин1984,
16 years ago,
#
Why should again address this tragedy?
− Артемий154М,
16 years ago,
#
5
Verti zomboyaschiku, and indeed to anyone whatsoever, except myself, 100% is not necessary, but the conclusions can be able to - be
− Likvidator,
16 years ago,
#
To believe the media (whatever they may be) - do not trust themselves.
− Heinkel,
16 years ago,
#
5
Thank you. The movie is really hard ...
− ARTMOTO63,
16 years ago,
#
5
The film stands and heavy. Looks at one go. I sympathize with all those who lost loved ones ...
− TRIMTR,
16 years ago,
#
5
The film is very heavy, thanks to that sheet. But really one thing to watch the disaster on television, another to attend the scene. It moved really complicated ... Thanks again
− blackcourse,
16 years ago,
#
5
Thank you for the movie!
− Fireworker,
16 years ago,
#
5
Thank you! Most of these films, it was very interesting to see, thank you) expect continued)
− Владимир Пахомов,
16 years ago,
#
-2
During the five to put that here?
− mikuz,
16 years ago,
#
For the material first and foremost, not the content.
− Fireworker,
16 years ago,
#
And what material is different from the content?
− mikuz,
16 years ago,
#
+1
material is an information component, and the content - meaning. sracha no reason to think ...
− Fireworker,
16 years ago,
#
Material here for 5-10 minutes.
− DrSnake,
16 years ago,
#
-3
5
Great movie! I do not understand a man who ruined the overall assessment of his unit. Have more to these films! If there are films about the crash (except that there already) - please lay out a large-will be very grateful!
− Vlad_md,
16 years ago,
#
+5
I do not understand the man who ruined the assessment. Play dumb version of the journalists - it is so cool! In general, the crash and movies about them - it is super! Five! Five! Five!
− mikuz,
16 years ago,
#
-9
Without evaluation, this video is not the topic here ...
− alel5,
16 years ago,
#
А вы, человек, храбро скрывающийся под ником "Аноним", в XXI веке чем занимаетесь, позвольте уточнить? Небось в тик-ток целыми днями просиживаете. Ну-ну. Вторую жизнь вам никто не подарит, а первую вы уже в тик-ток спустили.
−
~Anonymous~