Pyaterochka (but still to me more like 86)
− Eliot778,
16 years ago,
#
+1
5
Surely better to tie paneling and shelves can not be.
− Aleksandr55,
16 years ago,
#
+1
5
AFL Pts often the reverse is not using.
− qip88,
16 years ago,
#
+1
5
shaking really awful ... Tama whose IL-86 was well neponyal .. AFL-Don S‡S‚RѕR»SЊ?
− Captain_Black,
16 years ago,
#
5
5 and only five, it is rotten with Boeing, Airbus, and 96 flagship, the living embodiment of the IL-86.
− Учлет,
16 years ago,
#
5
but what it so kalbasit on braking? (judging by the sound) ... and what have RЅRyoRІRѕ reverse is not visible as fklyuchaetstso?
− tranzit_il,
16 years ago,
#
Judging by the sound, in my opinion, it generally forgotten Dig ...
− Captain_Black,
16 years ago,
#
+1
It seems to me that he was shaking so because not included reverse. And the brakes are conventional brakes.
− Specnaz3452,
16 years ago,
#
it is not forgotten, it simply is not included. This is seen
− Эрник,
16 years ago,
#
5
96, - krasafchik ...
− RegionAvia,
16 years ago,
#
-5
5
Video is good, but listening to the creak of plastic disgusting. I still want to see this trashy airplane somebody to buy ...
− AIR1982,
16 years ago,
#
Well with dryannostyu plane I do not agree, but the interior is really garbage!
− Aleksandr55,
16 years ago,
#
Are you a new saloon or flying with the old? New pomoemu anything ...
− Exelletor,
16 years ago,
#
I have flown with the old. About the new do not know.
− Aleksandr55,
16 years ago,
#
А вы, человек, храбро скрывающийся под ником "Аноним", в XXI веке чем занимаетесь, позвольте уточнить? Небось в тик-ток целыми днями просиживаете. Ну-ну. Вторую жизнь вам никто не подарит, а первую вы уже в тик-ток спустили.
−
~Anonymous~