But the plane itself is the original scheme of implementation of the "duck" when the wings and tail-flipped. stabilizer in the front, rear wings. And the engines pushing deployed screws ago. Perhaps such a scheme requires a flying addiction after the usual.
− Авиасиммер,
15 years ago,
#
The wings remain on the ground, usually set in the front or the optional swivel RV or completely transferred stabilizer with PB or turning the stabilizer from the tail in the bow. On the management usually is not affected, since the requirements for the longitudinal momentum remains unchanged.
− isc,
15 years ago,
#
4
dear sir, you do not Su-27 .. :)
− qip88,
16 years ago,
#
Yes I do understand: (drying so shook from side to side, there is stabilization of concrete.
− alshe,
16 years ago,
#
.. And the design, less susceptible to overloads))
− qip88,
16 years ago,
#
4
What the hell is swinging?
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
At such a small aircraft weight sat for the first time. Being unaccustomed twitching:)
− alshe,
16 years ago,
#
You drove the horse. They Shoot Horses, Do not They?
− MAPC,
16 years ago,
#
Realism was at a maximum ... In Ikse at exorbitant accelerations fall off on the design of the wings, flaps, nacelles and other fragments of the aircraft. Then everything was fine
− alshe,
16 years ago,
#
How to understand: "fall off"?
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
Just ... Clap and no wing or flap (disappear) and the plane flies down the screw. If the flap disappears - is a strong bias in this direction.
− alshe,
16 years ago,
#
Disappears? Something I have never had such ...
− serg09,
16 years ago,
#
Poroysya in the menu item "Special Options"
− alshe,
16 years ago,
#
2
Well, Ferrari is behind that?
− KIVLAR,
16 years ago,
#
-2
It is an ugly plane, IMHO
− Ivan_Taranov,
16 years ago,
#
А вы, человек, храбро скрывающийся под ником "Аноним", в XXI веке чем занимаетесь, позвольте уточнить? Небось в тик-ток целыми днями просиживаете. Ну-ну. Вторую жизнь вам никто не подарит, а первую вы уже в тик-ток спустили.
−
~Anonymous~