Tu-134A-AZAL
| Rating: 3.1!
+5
5
You have not yet uhal ?????
− F.C.M.K,
17 years ago,
#
+3
5
My God! It looks like he RІSЃRµS‚R°RєRyo took a laptop with you. Save and save ...))
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
+1
1
My God! RЈR¶RѕSЃ tries! even for X-plane
− .x.X.x.,
17 years ago,
#
+1
of all thy works none has risen above "3", try the quality, let better longer, but it will be better. No resentment
− .x.X.x.,
17 years ago,
#
and even better to tie this thing!))
− KirillS,
17 years ago,
#
=)
− Eliot778,
17 years ago,
#
3
The aircraft certainly needs some work, but in general udovletvoritelniy.Spasibo.
− bedui,
14 years ago,
#
4
4 for texture, considering what was the source. I was thinking that my first own "glued" to 6.70 version of Tu-134 disappeared into oblivion :-) The model (for 2007): credit default profiles, geometry and specifications hammered by more or less trouble with the fuselage (I later all body rotation tinkering with virtually zero). But it flies and it is quite bearable if to spit on the look :-)
− Flanker27,
15 years ago,
#
3
And thou, how to assess their work??? Surprising me, brattsy this subject - as a rabbit breeds and liveried aircraft, but on RєRѕRјRјRµRЅS‚S‹ not responding. White man at least zastesnyalsya or apologized. Maybe it furious champion MFS - discouraged the love of iksu!
− Dars,
17 years ago,
#
1
move 9 pleyn, preferably at MFS!
− KirillDIK,
17 years ago,
#