Good Tu-154M for 7.10
| Rating: 3.6!
Good Tu-154M for X-Plane v7.10. Archive includes:
1. Model
2. Three liveries:
a. Aeroflot 80s
b. Aeroflot 90s
c. Tupolev livery
3. Cocpit side views
4. Engine sounds, gear retraction, etc.
5. Readme
Have a nice flights!
1. Model
2. Three liveries:
a. Aeroflot 80s
b. Aeroflot 90s
c. Tupolev livery
3. Cocpit side views
4. Engine sounds, gear retraction, etc.
5. Readme
Have a nice flights!
→ Size:
14 MB
→ Date:
18 years ago (17.05.2008 01:10)
→ Author:
FOMAERO
→ License:
Freeware - Free version, Unlimited Distribution
→ Downloaded:
4682 time(s)
+8
How squalid Bird for X-Plaine ...
− evolved,
18 years ago,
#
+6
2
All can not calm down. Do not get you for X-plane that is normal to do. X-plane is late with its exit behind the great distance from MSFS.Nahrena you do here is spread. If you compare the Tu-154 aircraft for MSFS and X-plane it's just the horror of it rather than a model aircraft for simulator. The horror and how do you not understand that is hopelessly behind the times, you even look at activity on the forum X-plane, and here? Yes optimists blin ...
− Home Boy,
18 years ago,
#
+4
I think that prfessionalam need the most realistic conditions, so Hardly X-Plane can give something better than MSFS! And the fact that instead of just bluntly airport site and the band, and not a single building, and where the aircraft get the scripts, etc. to Simu??? I agree, but there quality is llusshego. I long to fly X-plane, exactly 2 years, compared to MSFS - childhood, but once again he has a right to exist!
− Carim,
18 years ago,
#
+1
This does not m-ka
− Pulkovsky_Pilot,
17 years ago,
#
+1
Indeed, the B-2!
− ivan6664,
17 years ago,
#
1
Judging from the screen, this no-Bae, neither DOE (S).
− Gran_D,
17 years ago,
#
Not really, see the X-Plane 7! At the 7-disc roll and, once set, and much disappointment is probably better to do for the 7-th can not be ...
− EugenePro,
18 years ago,
#
Then, and not understand - dvigly of Beshki and tail of the M-ki ^ ^
− Евгений,
18 years ago,
#
this is not M-ka and Beshka
− masmas,
18 years ago,
#
-1
1
lazha ....
− qip88,
18 years ago,
#
-1
5
Home Boy, all you can not calm down. That you are hopelessly behind. Look first for a version of a plane, and then write about sima retardation in general. Given that in the court of version 9, which is for 7.10 FOMAERO, to continue to do so.
− Азазель,
18 years ago,
#
-2
5
Author for trying. When you go to 9.22? then you work a halt. Read comments, funny still, people did for a handful of people who need an X in the seventh version, the DAC do not have all downloaded to see you so that at X pulls? Fly to enjoy what you want, leave it alone, the author, is valued skill. And what he did for seven, he could not afford to buy more advanced versions. We won by 3 MSFS X tyschi stands, many can not afford. So do not judge so strictly.
− omega,
17 years ago,
#
1150 is worth a dozen ...
− Pain,
17 years ago,
#
Well it depends where ...
− ivan6664,
17 years ago,
#
-2
5
The model is very good. Thanks to author! Better models have not yet met. FOMAERO rights - compare MSFS and X-Plan nestoit. All cycle: the time will come, and X-Plane for zatknet zone MSFS. But the question here about the specific files, rather than on simah in general. Thanks again for FOMAERO model!
− тайга,
18 years ago,
#
-2
5
Home Boy tie a mold to write if you do not mind missing it does not show it to people.
− ту134,
18 years ago,
#
-4
5
It is a pity that not a 10-ku! For diligence 5! For something that is not for the FS: 1 (not considered to be =))
− Nebes787,
17 years ago,
#
-4
I do not know what you are. In X-Plane has all the conditions. Again. He has an official trainer. Pliz That company yuzaet X-Plane use of physics (additional calculations are conducted separately, but sovmestono with simom) and full videochast sima http://www.solarimpulse.com/en/news/index.php?idContent = 2309 http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=31638
− Saturn,
18 years ago,
#
-5
X-Plane and MSFS - simulators. Just as Windows and Linux operating systems. They are doing the same thing, only differently. FS is designed for a broad audience of people who want polyubotatsya beautiful picture, bright planes, scenery, turn "drums" at Boeing, etc. Short-fun. X-Plane will not give such a visual delight, but mat.model program, in my opinion, is more robust. Use at least an editor for creating planes and their dynamics. This is the impression of these programs in the "pure" form. Of course, taking into account the quantity and quality addons, MSFS wins at times! And personally I am very pleased that people are engaged and IksPlanom and doing quite decent things. PS Somewhere read that Microsoft Flight Simulator are a hybrid of a simulator and vizualki from MS. And the possibility of the mathematical "engine" used by the game not 100% because of the lack of teh.dokumentatsii. That's done "pretty picture" and "boundless field for the activities of third-party developers. PS2 And as you saw in the last part of X-Plane fight bird on the glass))??
− CCConstantin,
18 years ago,
#
-6
How long more are going to argue that it is better - X-Plane or MSFS?!? It would be the plane was evaluated. PSSpasibo, Azazel. Thank tu134.
− FOMAERO,
18 years ago,
#
-7
5
very good
− viget,
17 years ago,
#